Over the weekend I read Ben Kuhn’s post on syntax highlighting and thought the idea sounded intriguing, so I tried it out.
Here’s what I had before (and let me add that I was tweaking my Vim colors a few days before this, so this wasn’t technically my normal setup) (and let me further add that this is fairly old code and not anything particular exciting):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9466/f9466222c7c9808d669515398066fce94b0e5703" alt="syntax-before.png"
And after, where comments are bold and brighter than the rest of the dim code:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd0c7/cd0c74873996f5561667196e72603d32dd168540" alt="syntax-after.png"
Hmm. This isn’t a perfect implementation of the idea in the least, but even so, I don’t know that I like having comments so predominant.
This does, however, give me several ideas for modifying my existing color scheme (or starting from scratch, which is feeling a bit more likely right now). Something more soothing, less garish. And still some way to make comments stand out more — italics or a somewhat brighter color, probably. (Sidenote: nvim-treesitter has caught my interest.)