<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
  <channel>
    <title>#recent-reads posts — Ben Crowder</title>
    <link>https://bencrowder.net/blog/tag/recent-reads/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://bencrowder.net/blog/tag/recent-reads/feed/" rel="self" />
    <description>Feed for blog posts tagged with #recent-reads.</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 20:02:35 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <generator>https://bencrowder.net/</generator>

    <item>
      <title>Booknotes 5.9</title>
      <link>https://bencrowder.net/blog/2026/booknotes-5-9/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://bencrowder.net/blog/2026/booknotes-5-9/</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Crowder]]></dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><cite>Mira’s Last Dance</cite>, by Lois McMaster Bujold, published 2017, fantasy, 109 pages. One of the Penric &amp; Desdemona novellas. Earthy bits aside, I enjoyed it as usual, and oh, what a sad day it will be when I finally run out of new Bujold to read. Luckily I still have a good amount left, and even after that, she is on my very short list of authors I plan to reread.</p>
<p><cite>The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl</cite>, by Timothy Egan, published 2006, history, 416 pages. Whew, that was harrowing — all the more so because the tragedy was avoidable, if only they’d known what they were doing. For me, the whole thing was a strong warning against having a careless relationship with the earth, and a reminder that there are better, healthier ways to meet our human needs without plundering and savaging this precious world we live in. Greed continues to ruin everything, as always.</p>
<p><cite>Blood in the Machine: The Origins of the Rebellion Against Big Tech</cite>, by Brian Merchant, published 2023, history, 561 pages. An important book, and one that feels particularly relevant right now, at least to me, as I watch my chosen industry mutating in ways I find reprehensible. I am a Luddite in spirit. Enjoyed the interwoven literary angle — Mary Shelley’s <cite>Frankenstein</cite>, Lord Byron — and reading about George IV as prince regent shortly after reading Greville’s memoirs, and about Mary Wollstonecraft shortly after reading Godwin’s biography. I like making things and I’ve found factories interesting from that perspective, but the human cost doesn’t seem worth it to me — the horrendous working conditions, the effects on the workers they replace, etc. There must be a better way. From the book:</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>But it is much more absurd to pretend there are no possible alternative arrangements—to think that technology, the product of concerted human invention and innovation, can only be introduced to society through reckless disruption, or that it’s unthinkable that advancements in technology might be integrated into our lives democratically and with care. If we are ingenious enough to automate large-scale production, build spacecraft, and invent artificial intelligences, are we not ingenious enough to ensure that advancing technology benefits all, and not just a few?</p>
</blockquote>
<p><cite>Stoner</cite>, by John Williams, published 1965, fiction, 219 pages. This has nothing to do with drugs, and no, not that John Williams. This is the fictional biography (a form I love) of an English professor in the first half of the twentieth century. Other than the earthy parts, I found it compelling even in its mundanity, though happy it is not. Humanity is messy. In the course of reading it I realized it was making me want to be a compassionate person, one who builds up those whose paths I cross in life. (I don’t remember what it was about the book that spawned those feelings, though.)</p><hr class="feed-extra" style="margin-top: 48pt;" /><p class="feed-extra feed-mail"><a href="mailto:ben.crowder@gmail.com?subject=Re%3A%20Booknotes 5.9">Reply via email</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Booknotes 5.8</title>
      <link>https://bencrowder.net/blog/2026/booknotes-5-8/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://bencrowder.net/blog/2026/booknotes-5-8/</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Crowder]]></dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><cite>The Greville Memoirs: A Journal of the Reigns of King George IV and King William IV volume 1</cite>, by Charles Greville (edited by Henry Reeve), published 1874, diary, 619 pages. Hot dang, I loved this. Even though I know very little about nineteenth-century politics in Britain (so far, anyway), these memoirs are what I never knew I wanted. Here are some sample passages, starting with Greville’s grumblings about George IV (who reminds me of a certain orange menace):</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>There never was such a man, or behaviour so atrocious as his—a mixture of narrow-mindedness, selfishness, truckling, blustering, and duplicity, with no object but self, his own ease, and the gratification of his own fancies and prejudices, without regard to the advice and opinion of the wisest and best informed men or to the interests and tranquillity of the country.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Also:</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>Objects which I used to contemplate at an immeasurable distance, and to attain which I thought would be the summit of felicity, I have found worth very little in comparison to the value my imagination used to set upon them.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And:</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>Three days ago Lord Liverpool was seized with an apoplectic or paralytic attack. The moment it was known every sort of speculation was afloat as to the probable changes this event would make in the Ministry. It was remarked how little anybody appeared to care about the <em>man</em>; whether this indifference reflects most upon the world or upon him, I do not pretend to say.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Very much looking forward to reading the remaining volumes.</p>
<p><cite>The Bell Jar</cite>, by Sylvia Plath, published 1963, fiction, 259 pages. Oof. I picked this up because I liked Plath’s poetry and maybe also as a small attempt to try to better understand my father’s suicide. The writing was indeed great, but whew, the second half was kind of brutal for me.</p>
<p><cite>Galileo’s Daughter: A Historical Memoir of Science, Faith, and Love</cite>, by Dava Sobel, published 1999, biography, 405 pages. I quite liked this, which is no huge surprise given how much I love reading about the history of science. It’s a biography of Galileo’s adult life, with lots of letters from his oldest daughter (a nun at a nearby convent) interleaved with the narrative, which covers Galileo’s research in astronomy and physics and of course the infamous trial. Reading this book made me realize I don’t spend nearly enough time actively thinking, or at least I don’t feel I do, which likely means instead that I’m not thinking about the things I wish I were. This passage is good:</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>“I believe that the intention of Holy Writ was to persuade men of the truths necessary for salvation,” Galileo continued his letter to Castelli, “such as neither science nor any other means could render credible, but only the voice of the Holy Spirit. But I do not think it necessary to believe that the same God who gave us our senses, our speech, our intellect, would have put aside the use of these, to teach us instead such things as with their help we could find out for ourselves, particularly in the case of these sciences of which there is not the smallest mention in the Scriptures; and, above all, in astronomy, of which so little notice is taken that the names of none of the planets are mentioned. Surely if the intention of the sacred scribes had been to teach the people astronomy, they would not have passed over the subject so completely.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p><cite>Sense and Sensibility</cite>, by Jane Austen, published 1811, fiction, 456 pages. Delightful and witty. Loved it. I’d seen some of the film adaptations before but had never read the book till now, and that was entirely my loss. Of Austen’s novels, I have left only <cite>Emma</cite> and <cite>Mansfield Park</cite>, and I look forward to completing the set in the not too distant future.</p><hr class="feed-extra" style="margin-top: 48pt;" /><p class="feed-extra feed-mail"><a href="mailto:ben.crowder@gmail.com?subject=Re%3A%20Booknotes 5.8">Reply via email</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Booknotes 5.7</title>
      <link>https://bencrowder.net/blog/2026/booknotes-5-7/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://bencrowder.net/blog/2026/booknotes-5-7/</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Crowder]]></dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><cite>Madame de Treymes</cite>, by Edith Wharton, published 1907, fiction, 74 pages. Great writing as always. With these Wharton novellas, I feel slowing down — not my natural instinct given the long list of books I want to read before someday shuffling off this mortal coil — is particularly rewarding and worthwhile.</p>
<p><cite>The Merchant of Prato: Francesco di Marco Datini, 1335–1410</cite>, by Iris Origo, published 1957, biography, 526 pages. Enjoyed this deep dive into the life of a medieval Tuscan merchant. Very detailed, thanks to Datini’s voluminous correspondence. Recommended if you’re into 1300s Tuscany, as I am. The preface includes this gem about the author:</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>The illegibility of her handwriting was also notorious. Her publisher and friend Jock Murray tells of tackling a passage at the bottom of a letter, which had defeated everyone else, and eventually deciphering the words: “Dearest Jock, I can’t read what I have written. Please type it out and send a copy to me.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And this, from Petrarch, on doctors back then (glad things have changed!):</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>No one heeded their prescriptions, for I have always besought my friends and bidden my servants that nothing should ever be carried out on my person of what physicians had ordered, but that, if indeed something must be done, it should be just the opposite.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><cite>Giving Up Is Unforgivable: A Manual for Keeping a Democracy</cite>, by Joyce Vance, published 2025, nonfiction, 168 pages. I’ve occasionally dipped into Vance’s newsletter for legal analysis on the criminal embarrassment that is Trump and his incompetent administration and all their unconstitutional mayhem, and her newsletter is solid. This book is likewise good, though it doesn’t have much legal analysis; it does, however, review Trump’s current attempts to destroy our democracy and turn himself into a vainglorious dictator, and it has recommendations for how to preserve our freedom. It’s about how rule of law and democracy are our best defense against the capricious, arbitrary whims of a tyrant, things we in America once again have firsthand knowledge of (re: Iran, tariffs, etc.). The book also points out (or maybe it’s just something I thought while reading it; I can’t remember) that anyone who is actively trying to make it harder for Americans to vote (cough SAVE Act cough) is fundamentally anti-American and an enemy of democracy.</p>
<p><cite>The Decameron</cite>, by Giovanni Boccaccio, published 1353 (translation by John Payne published 1886), fiction, 1,075 pages. What a bawdy, bawdy book. I found it repugnant, though near the end there were a couple very refreshing stories where someone chooses not to be immoral. (Shocking!) While I was in the middle of this, we came to Genesis 39 in our family scripture study and that too was a glorious breath of fresh air. I did enjoy the conclusion, where Boccaccio tries to defend his work against the objections he was sure were coming. All in all, I’m glad I read this for the sake of becoming better versed in medieval lit, but whew, never going to read it again. Also, incessant vice is boring.</p><hr class="feed-extra" style="margin-top: 48pt;" /><p class="feed-extra feed-mail"><a href="mailto:ben.crowder@gmail.com?subject=Re%3A%20Booknotes 5.7">Reply via email</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Booknotes 5.6</title>
      <link>https://bencrowder.net/blog/2026/booknotes-5-6/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://bencrowder.net/blog/2026/booknotes-5-6/</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Crowder]]></dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><cite>The Merchant of Venice</cite>, by William Shakespeare, published 1596, play, 82 pages. I first read this twenty-five years ago but apparently retained almost none of it. Aside from the antisemitism, I generally liked it.</p>
<p><cite>Destiny of the Republic: A Tale of Madness, Medicine, and the Murder of a President</cite>, by Candice Millard, published 2011, history, 368 pages. Loved it! The history — the assassination, the undiagnosed mental illness, the medical malpractice — is tragic and awful, of course, but the book itself is so good. Highly recommended. I also enjoyed the parts about Alexander Graham Bell and now want to read <cite>Reluctant Genius</cite>. And Garfield’s diary.</p>
<p><cite>Mere Christianity</cite>, by C. S. Lewis, published 1952, nonfiction, 239 pages. A reread after twenty years away. Overall, it held up. Lots of good stuff.</p>
<p><cite>Anne of Green Gables</cite>, by L. M. Montgomery, published 1908, fiction, 377 pages. I grew up on the Canadian miniseries but had never read the original book till now, which I’m glad I finally did because it’s delightful and wholesome and human and I loved it. And the ending! Poignant. (From what I can remember, by the way, the miniseries — which is on my list of “things to show to my kids as I irrationally try to recreate my childhood for them” — seems to be a fairly faithful adaptation.)</p><hr class="feed-extra" style="margin-top: 48pt;" /><p class="feed-extra feed-mail"><a href="mailto:ben.crowder@gmail.com?subject=Re%3A%20Booknotes 5.6">Reply via email</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Booknotes 5.5</title>
      <link>https://bencrowder.net/blog/2026/booknotes-5-5/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://bencrowder.net/blog/2026/booknotes-5-5/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Crowder]]></dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><cite>Shroud</cite>, by Adrian Tchaikovsky, published 2025, science fiction, 445 pages. I’d heard people say this was basically a better <cite>Alien Clay</cite>, but I felt the two books were quite different (and I liked both). Interesting ideas as usual. My fear of spoiling anything renders me mute beyond that.</p>
<p><cite>Supreme Inequality: The Supreme Court’s Fifty-Year Battle for a More Unjust America</cite>, by Adam Cohen, published 2020, history, 498 pages. Good book, though frustrating throughout because of the court’s frequent decisions in favor of the rich and powerful instead of normal people, and also because of slimy, underhanded tactics by Nixon and McConnell and others. I shouldn’t have been surprised by any of this, but still it stung. More and more, conservativism seems these days to me to be a blight that rots whate’er it touches and in many ways is fundamentally incompatible with the gospel of Jesus Christ. (Saying this as someone who grew up fairly conservative.)</p>
<p><cite>The White Album</cite>, by Joan Didion, published 1979, essays, 223 pages. Still loving Didion’s writing, about any topic. Liked this: a “place belongs forever to whoever claims it hardest, remembers it most obsessively, wrenches it from itself, shapes it, renders it, loves it so radically that he remakes it in his image.”</p>
<p><cite>The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet</cite>, by William Shakespeare, published 1597, play, 96 pages. Rather liked it — lots of great lines. Fun (if “fun” is the right word for a tragedy) (it’s not) to read it after reading Ovid on Pyramus and Thisbe. Also, it hits quite a bit differently now that I have teenagers around the age of Romeo and Juliet.</p><hr class="feed-extra" style="margin-top: 48pt;" /><p class="feed-extra feed-mail"><a href="mailto:ben.crowder@gmail.com?subject=Re%3A%20Booknotes 5.5">Reply via email</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Booknotes 5.4</title>
      <link>https://bencrowder.net/blog/2026/booknotes-5-4/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://bencrowder.net/blog/2026/booknotes-5-4/</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Crowder]]></dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><cite>Days of Rage: America’s Radical Underground, the FBI, and the Forgotten Age of Revolutionary Violence</cite>, by Bryan Burrough, published 2016, history, 814 pages. I’d had no idea there was a rash of bombings throughout the ’70s and had never heard of Weatherman or FALN or the SLA before this. It’s bonkers. Good book, though in the course of reading it I realized that maybe I don’t actually like reading about criminals all that much. (Or at least drugged-up violent ones.)</p>
<p><cite>War and Peace</cite>, by Leo Tolstoy (translated by Louise &amp; Aylmer Maude), published 1869 (translation published 1922), fiction, 2,175 pages. Very long, clearly, but oh so good, and most of the chapters are only a few pages long which helped a lot. I liked the translation, too. Lots of Tolstoy pontificating about history and military theory, with a little bit of math (calculus! actual equations!) thrown in for seasoning. The only part that felt like a slog to me was the second epilogue, but that’s probably because I was excited to cross the finish line.</p>
<p><cite>Journals of Dorothy Wordsworth volume 1</cite>, by Dorothy Wordsworth (edited by William Knight), published 1897, diary, 309 pages. Enjoyed this. It takes place in the Lake District and in Scotland and among other things is full of nature descriptions (like “the ivy twisting round the oaks like bristled serpents,” for a very short example), lots of walking around (and even after reading that, you are probably still underestimating just how much walking around there is in this journal), Coleridge not being well, and her brother William writing poetry. I think I enjoyed the Scotland trip the most. This resonated with me as a fellow diarist: “I have neglected to set down the occurrences of this week, so I do not recollect how we disposed of ourselves to-day.” I’ll leave you with this story: “The wife was very generous, gave food and drink to all poor people. She had a passion for feeding animals. She killed a pig with feeding it over much. When it was dead she said, ‘To be sure it’s a great loss, but I thank God it did not die clemmed’ (the Cheshire word for starved).”</p>
<p><cite>Eugene Onegin</cite>, by Alexander Pushkin (translated by Henry Spalding), published 1837 (translation published 1881), poetry, 140 pages. I knew nothing about this going in; I’d heard Pushkin’s name but that was it. Found it interesting enough, with some compelling characterization, but I didn’t love it.</p><hr class="feed-extra" style="margin-top: 48pt;" /><p class="feed-extra feed-mail"><a href="mailto:ben.crowder@gmail.com?subject=Re%3A%20Booknotes 5.4">Reply via email</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Booknotes 5.3</title>
      <link>https://bencrowder.net/blog/2026/booknotes-5-3/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://bencrowder.net/blog/2026/booknotes-5-3/</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Crowder]]></dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><cite>101 Things I Learned in Architecture School</cite>, by Matthew Frederick, published 2007, nonfiction, 101 pages. Liked it, especially the process-oriented design angle, and in what should not have been a surprise to me, reading about that process of designing architecture stirred up a bit of nostalgia for days long past when I was a UX designer.</p>
<p><cite>The Pigeon Tunnel: Stories from My Life</cite>, by John le Carré, published 2016, nonfiction, 377 pages. Interesting enough, though it probably would have been better if I’d read some of le Carré’s books first, given that it’s mostly stories from later in his life with notes on how some of them served as inspiration for various characters or scenes in his novels.</p>
<p><cite>A Short Autobiography of Countess Sophie Andreyevna Tolstoy</cite>, by Sophie Andreyevna Tolstoy (translated by S. S. Koteliansky and Leonard Woolf), published 1922, nonfiction, 105 pages. Enjoyed the parts about Tolstoy writing <cite>War and Peace</cite> (which I finished reading yesterday!) and <cite>Anna Karenina</cite>. I didn’t know much about the Tolstoys’ lives beforehand, so color me sad when I got to the end and read (both from Sophie’s side in the main text and from Tolstoy’s side in the footnotes) about their marriage falling apart and all the strife about the will and Tolstoy’s determination to put all of his works into the public domain.</p>
<p><cite>The Ideal Book: Essays and Lectures on the Arts of the Book</cite>, by William Morris (edited by William S. Peterson), published 1982, nonfiction, 117 pages. An interesting bit of book history by and about William Morris and Kelmscott Press. I’m far more minimalist than Morris and I don’t hate Bodoni like he does, but I do quite like his editions, and he remains an inspiration to me — particularly the part where he designed his own type. Someday!</p><hr class="feed-extra" style="margin-top: 48pt;" /><p class="feed-extra feed-mail"><a href="mailto:ben.crowder@gmail.com?subject=Re%3A%20Booknotes 5.3">Reply via email</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Booknotes 5.2</title>
      <link>https://bencrowder.net/blog/2026/booknotes-5-2/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://bencrowder.net/blog/2026/booknotes-5-2/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Crowder]]></dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><cite>Memoirs of the Author of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman</cite>, by William Godwin, published 1798, nonfiction, 99 pages. One of the biographies mentioned in <cite>This Long Pursuit</cite>, it’s Mary Wollstonecraft’s husband writing after she died (just six months post-wedding) about her life. Quite good, short read, felt very human. Sad at the end, of course, with a fair amount of detail on Wollstonecraft’s death in childbirth.</p>
<p><cite>Thin Air: A Ghost Story</cite>, by Michelle Paver, published 2016, horror, 161 pages. Read this for book group. It’s creepy and triggered my fear of heights. Not sure how I feel about the ending, though. A little abrupt, perhaps.</p>
<p><cite>The Buffalo Hunter Hunter</cite>, by Stephen Graham-Jones, published 2025, horror, 504 pages. Though horror isn’t really my thing, I quite liked this, particularly the title (which is what drew me in in the first place) and the triple layers of nesting and the diary format. Recommended if you like horror.</p>
<p><cite>A Book of One’s Own: People and Their Diaries</cite>, by Thomas Mallon, published 1984, nonfiction, 293 pages. As one who loves reading diaries (published diaries, to be clear) and has kept one for the last several decades, I found this compelling and ate it up. Came out of it with a long list of books I now want to read. I also realized it’s been a very long while since I actually spent time reading any diaries (or letter compilations), so I’m working on remedying that.</p><hr class="feed-extra" style="margin-top: 48pt;" /><p class="feed-extra feed-mail"><a href="mailto:ben.crowder@gmail.com?subject=Re%3A%20Booknotes 5.2">Reply via email</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Booknotes 5.1</title>
      <link>https://bencrowder.net/blog/2026/booknotes-5-1/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://bencrowder.net/blog/2026/booknotes-5-1/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Crowder]]></dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><cite>This Hallowed Ground: A History of the Civil War</cite>, by Bruce Catton, published 1956, nonfiction, 733 pages. Riveting. This was my first time really reading about the Civil War in detail as an adult. I hadn’t been aware how inexperienced both sides were in military matters, nor had I realized how much they bungled things over the course of the war. (Which I suspect is common to all wars.) Great writing, and this was a good single-volume history of the war. The last part was particularly memorable. Looking forward to reading Catton’s other Civil War histories.</p>
<p><cite>Shirley Jackson: A Rather Haunted Life</cite>, by Ruth Franklin, published 2016, nonfiction, 704 pages. Compelling and interesting and sad — speaking mainly of Jackson’s relationships with her mother and her husband on that last point, along with her early death at forty-nine. I’ve read only “The Lottery” and <cite>The Haunting of Hill House</cite> so far, but I’m looking forward to <cite>We Have Always Lived in the Castle</cite> (which my brain is convinced is the same book as <cite>I Capture the Castle</cite>).</p>
<p><cite>The Pickwick Papers</cite>, by Charles Dickens, published 1837, fiction, 1,194 pages. Though this wasn’t my first Dickens, it felt like it in some ways because I am finally receptive, ready at long last to appreciate his writing. And I loved it — the voice! the humor! the humanity! Though his being only twenty-four when it was published is a fact that pours a little bit of jealousy into my soul. The Gabriel Grub story felt like a precursor to <cite>A Christmas Carol</cite> in several ways. Enjoyed the Bardell trial, and Sam Weller and his dad, and Mr. Jingle’s way of speaking. The commentary on debtors’ prisons was worthwhile, too. Very much looking forward to reading the rest of Dickens.</p>
<p><cite>This Long Pursuit: Reflections of a Romantic Biographer</cite>, by Richard Holmes, published 2016, nonfiction, 379 pages. Loved this autobiography (of sorts; it’s not a typical autobiography) about biography and Romanticism, and I came out of it with a long list of biographies I want to read — Mary Wollstonecraft, Shelley, Coleridge, Keats, Mary Somerville, Thomas Lawrence, Boswell’s Johnson (of course) and more. I’m also itching at the bit to read Holmes’ <cite>The Age of Wonder</cite>, a history of science in the late 1700s.</p><hr class="feed-extra" style="margin-top: 48pt;" /><p class="feed-extra feed-mail"><a href="mailto:ben.crowder@gmail.com?subject=Re%3A%20Booknotes 5.1">Reply via email</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Booknotes 4.33</title>
      <link>https://bencrowder.net/blog/2025/booknotes-4-33/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://bencrowder.net/blog/2025/booknotes-4-33/</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Crowder]]></dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><cite>Moonbound</cite>, by Robin Sloan, published 2024, science fiction, 363 pages. For some reason I went into this worried I wouldn’t like it — which was silly since I liked both of Sloan’s other books and have been following and enjoying his newsletter for ages — but I adored it from the first page. Delightfully imaginative.</p>
<p><cite>On Liberty</cite>, by John Stuart Mill, published 1859, nonfiction, 205 pages. After reading Mill’s autobiography earlier this year, I figured I ought to try some of his political science writing. This was good, and I found myself agreeing with a fair amount of it — e.g., people generally ought to be free to do things if those things don’t hurt people, and yes, there’s a lot more nuance to it than that. (And yet even as I say this, I don’t think of myself as a libertarian. Probably because I haven’t audited my point of view thoroughly enough to be able to label it in any meaningful way. I should do that.) Appreciated the plug for diversity and the unexpected defense of the Church’s polygamy at the time. There was also an interesting bit about there being a natural convergence toward cultural homogeneity. Lots of food for thought.</p>
<p><cite>The Lights Go Out in Lychford</cite>, by Paul Cornell, published 2019, fantasy, 120 pages. Fourth in the Lychford series, and I liked it as much as the others. Dark and dangerous. And that ending!</p>
<p><cite>Ironclads</cite>, by Adrian Tchaikovsky, published 2017, science fiction, 137 pages. A compelling, quick read. Enjoyed it as usual, though maybe not quite as much as the other Tchaikovsky I’ve read.</p>
<p><cite>Lolly Willowes</cite>, by Sylvia Townsend Warner, published 1926, fantasy, 197 pages. Good writing, particularly the descriptions of the natural world (of which there are many). The last part of the book did not at all go where I thought it might, and I’m glad it didn’t.</p>
<p><cite>Where the Drowned Girls Go</cite>, by Seanan McGuire, published 2022, fantasy, 146 pages. Wayward Children book 7. Really liked it — dark, dangerous (I’m starting to sense a trend here), and slightly creepy, as usual, in a way I wish were more common in fantasy fiction. (You’d think horror might be what I’m looking for, by the way, but I find it’s usually over my threshold and I have to nope out. Dark fantasy is more my thing.)</p><hr class="feed-extra" style="margin-top: 48pt;" /><p class="feed-extra feed-mail"><a href="mailto:ben.crowder@gmail.com?subject=Re%3A%20Booknotes 4.33">Reply via email</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
