Adam Singer with more evidence that short-form video rots your brain. Avoid, avoid, avoid.

Kyle Orland on AI use leading to cognitive surrender. “Overall, across 1,372 participants and over 9,500 individual trials, the researchers found subjects were willing to accept faulty AI reasoning a whopping 73.2 percent of the time, while only overruling it 19.7 percent of the time.” Another reason to steer clear of AI.

Jim Nielsen on skill issues and human-centered design. “Whereas a human-centered approach flips that: the technology exists to serve people as they actually are, not as we wish them to be. Confusion is allowed to be seen as a design failure, not a user failure.”

Ink & Switch’s dither explorer. Cool.

Reply via email

Teddy Macker on David W. Orr and a healing vision for America. This was so, so good. Highly recommended. This quote from Orr at the beginning sets the tone: “The plain fact is that the planet does not need more successful people. But it does desperately need more peacemakers, healers, restorers, storytellers, and lovers of every kind. It needs people who live well in their places. It needs people of moral courage willing to join the fight to make the world habitable and humane. And these qualities have little to do with success as we have defined it.”

Matt Glassman on how you should invite people over to your home regularly. This is good advice.

Han Lee on the AI Great Leap Forward. This really resonated. I really do not like AI mandates.

Becca Rothfeld on how you don’t have to use AI. “I am saying that the bar for using AI for anything, even something stupid and mindless, should be extraordinarily high.”

Henry Oliver’s post of someone else’s comment about teaching poetry to Latter-day Saint students raised on the KJV.

Christopher Drum on CAD-3D on the Atari ST. Particularly liked the parts about friction and UI density.

David Cain on enjoying things on purpose.

kqr on slide rules for kitchen measurements. After reading this, I ordered a slide rule. (Still need to learn how to use it, though.)

Photonist on documentary photography in the age of AI. This feels more human to me.

Elisa Gabbert on the essay as realm.

Ross Barkan on fiction and AI.

James O’Sullivan on writing with AI. “If you need a large language model to write, you are not a writer.”

Aubrey Hirsch’s comic on ChatGPT dads. Ha.

Alan Jacobs on redistributing your media portfolio (going analog, mainly).

Open Printer, “an open-source, repairable inkjet printer designed for makers, artists, and anyone tired of throwaway hardware. Built with standard mechanical components and modular parts, it’s easy to assemble, modify, and repair. You can print on standard sheets or paper rolls and choose between black or color cartridges, refillable at your convenience.” Cool.

W. Evan Sheehan on LLM-generated code in Neovim.

Niels Leenheer wrote a DOOM with CSS. Wow.

Analog cameras that can be 3D printed.

Alex Chan’s personalized garbage collection calendar via a Python script.

Frank Elavsky on why people should stop saying AI is just a tool. Yep. His post on prototyping is also good.

Lisette, a little language inspired by Rust that compiles to Go.

Heerich.js, a tiny engine for 3D voxel scenes rendered to SVG.

Playbit Runtime, an interesting “runtime designed for highly dynamic graphical apps that are collaborative, with a really good set of developer tools.”

Den Odell on Pretext, that shiny new text layout JS library.

Tracy Durnell on personalized computing and agentic AI.

Audrey Watters on AI. “The future that the vast majority of people want – for themselves, for their children – is not one in which we can only afford to buy digital replicas of products and digital real estate (Facebook board member Marc Andreessen has been quite explicit about this goal) because everything that’s actually real is only accessible to the rich; where we’re all yanked around by algorithms; where there are no jobs; where there is no art, only slop; where there is no green space, no wilderness, no water because the planet is covered in the data centers that power this destruction.”

Sharif Shameem on how willingness to look stupid is a moat in creative work.

Matthias Ott on AI and the shape of friction.

Christopher Butler on making art by hand.

Brian Leli on how LLMs are antithetical to writing and humanity.

Pavel Laptev on shiny new CSS features.

ReadBeanIceCream’s plain text kanban reading board.

Cory Doctorow on AI psychoses.

Audrey Watters on AI again.

Marcin Wichary on AI autocomplete suggestions.

Jonas Hietala on one-bag travel for work.

Hyperwood, open source furniture.

Alexander Petros on how XML is a cheap DSL.

Lisa Charlotte Muth on moving all her content back onto her site.

Scott Smitelli on generative AI.

Sean Boots on generative AI vegetarianism.

zkbro on slowing down.

Marcin Wichary on web haptics on iOS.

Ada Palmer on why all science fiction and fantasy writers are historians.

Lev Grossman from 2014 on getting to the halfway point in NaNoWriMo.

Michael Uloth on switching configs for Neovim.

Rusty Foster on how AI isn’t people.

Robin Rendle on how the world is still so full of dinosaurs.

Marcin Wichary on Lotus 1-2-3 and two-line menubars.

Lyra on how you no longer need JavaScript for a lot of things.

Matthias Ott on LLM bots scraping the web incessantly. I’ve run into this as well. Ugh.

Dave Gauer on the love of programming (in the face of AI). This resonated.

A post on holding on to your hardware since the AI data centers could very well make it hard to get in the future.

Mandy Brown on specialists.

Scott on Gopher. Ah, nostalgia.

Halvor William Sanden on anti-intellectual tech.

Marcus Hutchins on the reasons he hates AI.

Bret Victor on AI. “If we take ‘AI’ to mean the current trend of deep-learning models trained on large datasets, there are a number of ways in which these techniques are incompatible with our values.”

Eliot on Henyapente and binary biology in the Gameboy OS.

An HTML quine. Also see Markdown CSS.

Rich Hickey on AI.

Matt Sephton’s WebGL CRT shader.

Matthew Walther on reading one hundred pages a day.

Oliver Burkeman on the power of immediacy.

Jim Nielsen on the anchor element’s href attribute.

Virginia Postrel on libraries of matter.

Fontquant, a tool to quantify what fonts can do.

Whew!

Reply via email

Brad East on how AI changes us. “The relevant questions to ask about AI and any and all usage of the variety of tools that go under its name are moral, theological, and formational. What kind of person is it likely to make me to be? What virtues or vices will it develop or diminish? In what ways is it likely to expand and enrich my (our) humanity—the good life—and in what ways is it unlikely to do so?” An angle I haven’t seen mentioned nearly enough.

John Scalzi’s thoughts on AI. Liked this.

Juha-Matti Santala on having different notebook sizes for different ideas. I like this. Lately I’ve been all-in on Field Notes, but I still have other sizes of notebooks (including other sizes of Field Notes) and have been trying to figure out how I want to use them.

Maxime Heckel on halftone shaders. Fun.

Reply via email

Bob Nystrom on knitting. “Let’s say that, like me, you are a person who stares at a computer and writes code for a living. As a straight male who grew up in a time where knitting was very strongly female coded, it for the most part never occurred to me that knitting was a thing I could do and might enjoy. Regardless of your demographic categories and background, it’s possible that you have also not really considered knitting. This article exists to get you to do so. Specifically, I’ll try to convince you, one software person to another, why it might be a good fit for your life and brain. This is a pitch for knitting, but—for better or worse—an extremely nerdily argued one.” I read this, promptly bought a needle and yarn, and spent an hour learning how to knit. (Have I done anything with it since then? Um, no. But someday soon I hope to get back into it.)

Henrik Karlsson on political power and Robert A. Caro’s books. “But Caro’s subjects are willing to do anything to win, so they will, so to speak, pump fracking fluid into the ground. They will press it into every little crevice, forcing drops of power mixed with sand to the surface. And as it turns out, if you extract all the small things and pool them together, it can be a massive reserve of power, indeed.”

Marcin Wichary on Flickr’s URL scheme, which had a strong influence on me back in the day.

Wm Morris on the current opportunity for Latter-day Saint writers. “There are pockets of interesting Mormon culture happening everywhere. And the lack of a true center for it limits material resources and access to audience, but also liberates artists from the slim hope of wide acclaim and the imprimatur of respectability.” I found this inspiring.

Reply via email

Jason Gorman on how coding is not necessarily the most productive part. This line especially resonated with me: “And if we’re producing code faster than we can validate it — either by exploring the problem ourselves, or learning from user feedback if our release cycles are fast enough — then we’re piling assumptions on top of assumptions.”

Jeremy Keith on frontend libraries and frameworks and LLMs. “Is it really all that different? With npm you dialled up other people’s code directly. With large language models, they first slurp up everyone’s code (like, the whole World Wide Web), run a computationally expensive process of tokenisation, and then give you the bit you need when you need it. In a way, large language model coding tools are like a turbo-charged npm with even more layers of abstraction.”

Marcin Wichary on Roger Wong’s post about Anthropic’s findings that using AI to write software seems to lead to less understanding of the code. Which makes sense, at least to me.

Elizabeth Goodspeed on analogue creative work. “As a longtime fan of all things analogue, I should be thrilled. There have always been contemporary artists committed to doggedly tactile work – more of them would be even better! But when I look closely at much of the purportedly handmade work floating around these trend reports, I can’t help but wonder how much of it is made by hand at all.” I don’t try to pass my digital art off as being actually handmade, but trying to make digital pieces look analogue? Guilty. Very guilty. For me it’s been a matter of convenience and familiarity and back pain, but more and more I find myself wanting to make real things instead, physical things. Maybe 2026 will be the year where I finally make the leap. Also, I love Goodspeed’s “doggedly tactile” phrase, which I’m taking as a reminder that making things by hand is good, hard work.

Reply via email

Scott Shambaugh on how an AI agent blogged a hit piece on him after he turned down a matplotlib pull request from the agent. Apparently innocuous intentions aside, I worry how much damage and chaos these agents are going to cause across the internet.

Sophie Koonin on AI-generated code. “As I see more and more people generating code instead of writing it, I find myself wondering why engineers are so ready and willing to do away with one of the good bits of our jobs (coding) and leave themselves with the boring bit (reviews).”

Secrets of Privacy on ads in AI chatbots. Disturbing. Yet another reason to avoid LLMs.

Joe Crawford on how we’re in a web renaissance now. And it’s a wonderful thing. Visiting people’s personal websites is, for me, so much more delightful than social networks ever were.

Reply via email

Raptitude on covering your twenty-five miles and then resting up. I read this and liked it a lot — this is how you do big things — and then some time later as I was nearing the end of War and Peace I came across the original passage, which was fun.

James Brown on what makes programming great. Liked this.

Matheus Lima on life happening at 1x speed. While I think this is good advice — efficiency often has downsides, and slowing down can enhance the quality of one’s experience — I do also think some things can be consumed at a slightly faster clip without lossiness, and sometimes the qualitative changes that accompany the speed increase are worth it, at least in my experience with reading.

Alex Harri’s deep dive into rendering higher-quality ASCII art. Fun. Using the shape of the characters to effectively bump up the resolution seems so obvious in retrospect.

Reply via email

Stand with Minnesota. I meant to post this weeks ago. I cannot wait until Stephen Miller is gone — not to mention our criminal-in-chief and all his other cronies — and I hope ICE is brought to heel soon. (I do try to keep these link posts from veering political all the time, but goodness, these are not ordinary times.)

John Gruber on the names they call themselves. “‘Fascist’ and ‘Nazi’ weren’t slurs that were applied to them by their political or military opponents. That’s what they called themselves, and their names became universally recognized slurs because the actions and beliefs of the Fascists and Nazis were universally recognized as reprehensible and evil. And because they lost.”

Brandon Sanderson on the hidden cost of AI art and how artmaking changes us. “The purpose of writing all those books in my earlier years wasn’t to produce something I could sell, it was to turn me into someone who could create great art. It took an amateur and it made him a professional. I think this is why I rebel against AI art products so much: because they steal the opportunity for growth from us.”

Bhaskar Mitra on AI madness and leaving Big Tech because of “an unprecedented concentration of power in the hands of those in Big Tech who want to deliberately enact (or, at least, are incapable of imagining anything other than) a techno-fascist future.” Yep.

Baldur Bjarnason on LLMs. Particularly the list of downsides. (If it feels like these link posts are becoming anti-AI all the time, by the way, you’re not wrong. The hype is ridiculous and needs to be deflated, and I believe there are serious risks that are being glossed over much of the time. But I also don’t want the overall feel of this blog to skew negative, so after this I may take a break from linking to AI posts, at least for a little while.)

Robin Sloan on flood fill vs. the magic circle. Enjoyed this take on how even if AI continues to proliferate, it still won’t affect everything in life. “A pleasing image: if indeed AI automation does not flood fill the physical world, it will be because the humble paper jam stood in its way.”

Marcin Wichary on Switch Angel making a trance track in Strudel. Enjoyed both the video (wow!) and Wichary’s commentary, and dang, Strudel is intriguing.

Neil Sainsbury on mathematics for the self-learner, with book recommendations. After reading through the list, I immediately ordered four of the Dover editions. Read at your own risk!

Reply via email

Brad East on Wake Up Dead Man. “I have a soft spot for any popular entertainment that doesn’t make a mockery of Christian faith, or reduce it to woo, or project infinite doubt onto all believers, or unmask every pastor as a cynical abuser. Johnson succeeds on all counts.” Same.

Robert Alter, via Alan Jacobs, on Bible translations. “Modern translators, in their zeal to uncover the meanings of the biblical text for the instruction of a modern readership, frequently lose sight of how the text intimates its meanings — the distinctive, artfully deployed features of ancient Hebrew prose and poetry that are the instruments for the articulation of all meaning, message, insight, and vision.” I’ve subconsciously noticed something in this vein lately — while the NIV is clearer and easier to understand, it’s missing the poetry of the KJV. Planning to read Alter’s translation at some point.

Stefan Judis on language-specific quotes in CSS. I didn’t know you could do this!

David Ferry on a newish hypothesis that Parkinson’s might be caused by water laced with TCE. Intriguing.

John Gruber responding to Jason Fried’s post on design regressions as companies try to jam modern technology into everything. Agreed. (I think this pairs well with the Ted Gioia post I recently linked to on secondhand purchases.)

Nikita Prokopov on the rampant inconsistencies in macOS Tahoe’s icons. Maybe Apple isn’t doing design reviews. Regardless, I’m avoiding upgrading to iOS 26 and Tahoe for as long as I can while hoping that Apple comes to its senses soon.

Tash on some contemporary fiction lacking moral gravitas. “In many contemporary novels, I cannot help feeling that I am reading about the actions of characters driven largely by their own whims and passions without any placement in, or reference to, a wider sphere of meaning.” Food for thought. Tash’s post on the negative effects of AI-created art is good, too.

Joel Cunningham’s review of the Xteink X4, a small e-ink reader. The phone form factor (like a smaller Boox Palma) and the price look appealing; the typography, less so. I don’t think I’m going to get one myself, at least not right now, but I’m interested to see where this goes down the road.

Reply via email

Dan Wang’s 2025 letter on China and the U.S. Good analysis. Looking forward to reading his new book, Breakneck.

Booktime on the legacy of The Power Broker. “I believe its legacy is much more complex than many of the retrospectives published in major outlets over the last month make it seem.” A good counterpoint, at least for this Caro fanboy.

Roy Scholten’s LEGO Letterpress art. Fun.

Lofi microbes to study/relax to. Ha. I don’t actually use YouTube for things like this, but I love the idea of a livestream of microbes.

Graphite, a newish open source graphics app. I’ve played around with it a little, and the procedural node-based editing seems like it may end up being useful in making my art.

Emily Bressler in McSweeney’s with “I Work For an Evil Company, but Outside Work, I’m Actually a Really Good Person.” Ha.

Ted Gioia on why secondhand is now better than buying things new. This does seem true, and what a pity that is.

JA Westenberg on the case for blogging in the ruins. “The blog, at its best (a best I aspire one day to reach) is Montaigne’s direct descendant. It’s a form that allows for intellectual exploration without demanding premature certainty. You can write a post working through an idea, acknowledge in the post itself that you’re not sure where you’ll end up, and invite readers to think alongside you. You can return to the topic weeks later with updated thoughts. The format accommodates the actual texture of thinking, which is messy and recursive and full of wrong turns.”

Reply via email