<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
  <channel>
    <title>#indesign posts — Ben Crowder</title>
    <link>https://bencrowder.net/blog/tag/indesign/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://bencrowder.net/blog/tag/indesign/feed/" rel="self" />
    <description>Feed for blog posts tagged with #indesign.</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 05:22:16 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <generator>https://bencrowder.net/</generator>

    <item>
      <title>I’ve decided to ditch Adobe’s Creative Cloud apps — Photoshop, InDesign, and Illustrator, mainly. I...</title>
      <link>https://bencrowder.net/blog/2021/1121/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://bencrowder.net/blog/2021/1121/</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2021 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Crowder]]></dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>I’ve decided to ditch Adobe’s Creative Cloud apps — Photoshop, InDesign, and Illustrator, mainly. I never thought I’d say that, but they’re too expensive. Instead, I’ll be using Affinity Photo, Affinity Publisher, and Affinity Designer. It’s a fairly small one-time cost instead of a dreary, never-ending, money-sucking subscription.</p>
<p>(If/when I need to do motion graphics or video editing in place of After Effects and Premiere, by the way, I’m planning to use the free version of DaVinci Resolve.)</p>
<p>So far I’ve only actually used Affinity Photo, to texture the piece I released yesterday. Worked like a charm. The live split-screen preview when applying a filter is brilliant, and the file sizes are much smaller, too. (In Photoshop I’d regularly end up with a 1–2 GB PSB file. With Affinity Photo, it’s closer to 300 MB.)</p>
<p>As far as typesetting goes, I still expect to use TeX (Tectonic) on projects where it makes sense — it’s what I used on the wide margin study editions since typesetting each language individually would have taken much more time — but it’s nice to have Affinity Publisher for other projects. I’m planning to use it for the book of narrative poems I’m (slowly) working on. (I’ll be setting it with Hinte, a new typeface I’m designing in FontForge. More on that soon.)</p>
<p>With Figma doing most of what I used to use Illustrator for, I don’t expect to use Affinity Designer all that much initially. But the raster brush textures are intriguing. We’ll see.</p><hr class="feed-extra" style="margin-top: 48pt;" /><p class="feed-extra feed-mail"><a href="mailto:ben.crowder@gmail.com?subject=Re%3A%20I’ve decided to ditch Adobe’s Creative Cloud apps — Photoshop, InDesign, and Illustrator, mainly. I...">Reply via email</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Quad</title>
      <link>https://bencrowder.net/blog/2016/quad/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://bencrowder.net/blog/2016/quad/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Crowder]]></dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Matthew Butterick posted a link today to <a href="http://docs.racket-lang.org/quad/">Quad</a>, his in-development typesetting engine, written in Racket. It’s an attempt to take the best ideas from both LaTeX and web browsers and build a modern, flexible typesetting engine.</p>
<p>The syntax (at least as it stands right now) is naturally very LISPy, and the examples are fairly low-level, but I’m quite interested to see where things go. While I haven’t done much typesetting lately, I’ve been itching to do more in LaTeX and less in InDesign, so that my source files are plain text and not locked into a proprietary format. And some things are more easily done in code. Also, I’ve wanted to share the source files for my work (as I’ve started doing with the PlotDevice sources for my language charts), but putting InDesign files in a GitHub repo just feels wrong. And InDesign isn’t exactly cheap, either.</p>
<p>So, LaTeX for now, and possibly Quad once it’s matured a bit.</p><hr class="feed-extra" style="margin-top: 48pt;" /><p class="feed-extra feed-mail"><a href="mailto:ben.crowder@gmail.com?subject=Re%3A%20Quad">Reply via email</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A better OpenType user interface</title>
      <link>https://bencrowder.net/blog/2014/a-better-opentype-user-interface/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://bencrowder.net/blog/2014/a-better-opentype-user-interface/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Crowder]]></dc:creator>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>I like Kris Sowersby’s suggestions for <a href="https://klim.co.nz/blog/towards-an-ideal-opentype-user-interface/">a more ideal OpenType user interface</a> in document design apps like InDesign.</p><hr class="feed-extra" style="margin-top: 48pt;" /><p class="feed-extra feed-mail"><a href="mailto:ben.crowder@gmail.com?subject=Re%3A%20A better OpenType user interface">Reply via email</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
