<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BenCrowder.net &#187; Math</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bencrowder.net/blog/category/math/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bencrowder.net</link>
	<description>I make stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:47:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Inside out</title>
		<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/09/inside-out/</link>
		<comments>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/09/inside-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top of the Mountains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topofthemountains.net/2006/09/19/inside-out/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Thought Provoking Message of the Day, I read about the &#8220;Worm Whisperer&#8221; this morning.  Quite interesting &#8212; Kelly Dorgan &#8220;has challenged a century-old theory, endorsed by none other than Charles Darwin, about how worms move.&#8221;  Everyone used to think that worms (and other burrowing creatures) would actually eat the mud, ingest it, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://tpmotd.blogspot.com/2006/09/tap-push-mouth-out-tunnel-dirt.html">Thought Provoking Message of the Day</a>, I read about the <a href="http://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/80d15f1a587ad010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd/6.html">&#8220;Worm Whisperer&#8221;</a> this morning.  Quite interesting &#8212; Kelly Dorgan &#8220;has challenged a century-old theory, endorsed by none other than Charles Darwin, about how worms move.&#8221;  Everyone used to think that worms (and other burrowing creatures) would actually eat the mud, ingest it, and then excrete it.  Not anymore:</p>

<blockquote>
By studying the stress fields around the worms, Dorgan discovered that they actually launch their mouths inside out like a wedge to pry open the mud. Then they ease into the space opened by the crack. To keep moving, they just keep leveraging the crack.
</blockquote>

<p>That&#8217;s cool. :)</p>

<p>There are nine other people profiled in the Popular Science article, including <a href="http://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/80d15f1a587ad010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd/2.html">Nima Arkani-Hamed</a> (fifth dimension, multiple universes), <a href="http://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/80d15f1a587ad010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd/4.html">Melody Swartz</a> (growing organs), <a href="http://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/80d15f1a587ad010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd/7.html">Omar Yaghi</a> (hydrogen nanoscaffolds), and <a href="http://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/80d15f1a587ad010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd/8.html">Terry Tao</a> (cleaning up jumbled signals mathematically).  Fascinating stuff, really &#8212; I recommend reading through all of the articles.</p>

<p>[tags]Popular Science, Kelly Dorgan, Nima Arkani-Hamed, Melody Swartz, Omar Yaghi, Terry Tao[/tags]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/09/inside-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(cons calculus (cdr &#8216;(eating is fun)))</title>
		<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/08/cons-calculus-cdr-eating-is-fun/</link>
		<comments>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/08/cons-calculus-cdr-eating-is-fun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lisp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outside the Box]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsidethebox.blankslate.net/2006/08/16/cons-calculus-cdr-eating-is-fun/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night I spent an hour or so working through Calculus and Pizza: A Cookbook for the Hungry Mind.  While I don&#8217;t care so much for all the pizza/food stuff (extra fluff that gets in the way of what I&#8217;m after), the math is good.  I&#8217;ve relearned how to do derivatives, find local [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night I spent an hour or so working through <i>Calculus and Pizza: A Cookbook for the Hungry Mind</i>.  While I don&#8217;t care so much for all the pizza/food stuff (extra fluff that gets in the way of what I&#8217;m after), the math is good.  I&#8217;ve relearned how to do derivatives, find local minima and maxima, use the chain rule and extended power rule, and so on.  Still haven&#8217;t gotten to integrals yet, though.  The calculus is pretty easy, I must admit; the only thing that keeps hanging me up is the algebra.  Most of the algebra is a piece of cake, of course, but there are little bits and pieces here and there that I keep forgetting.  But it&#8217;s coming back.</p>

<p>After that, I picked up <i>The Little Schemer</i> and spent a most enjoyable two hours working through the first 80 pages.  At first I didn&#8217;t intend to actually write all of the little functions you&#8217;re expected to write, but I&#8217;m glad I did.  And to my small surprise, I was able to write all of them without too much trouble.  We&#8217;re talking functions like +, -, >, and &lt; , folks.  Simple stuff.  It&#8217;s like writing the language from scratch yourself.  (Yes, I know there&#8217;s more truth to that than there may seem at first. :))</p>

<p>The coolest thing is learning how to solve problems recursively rather than iteratively.  Sure, some of this stuff would be far easier using a for loop, but using recursion like this means no side effects (at least if I understand correctly), and that&#8217;s sweet.  I can&#8217;t wait to finish the rest of the book and move on to The Seasoned Schemer.  (And I&#8217;ll be glad when we move on to higher-level programs, too.)</p>

<p>Oh, the parentheses in Scheme don&#8217;t bother me at all &#8212; in fact, I rather like them. :)</p>

<p>[tags]calculus, Scheme[/tags]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/08/cons-calculus-cdr-eating-is-fun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Binomials and cubic splines and such</title>
		<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/08/binomials-and-cubic-splines-and-such/</link>
		<comments>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/08/binomials-and-cubic-splines-and-such/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top of the Mountains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topofthemountains.net/2006/08/15/binomials-and-cubic-splines-and-such/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night I started reading Calculus and Pizza, going through the first four or five chapters (along with the exercises).  I love calculus!  Derivatives have come back from the misty hollow of my memory with lightning speed, and the other bits (the chain rule, etc.) are hot on their heels.  It&#8217;s tremendously [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night I started reading <i>Calculus and Pizza</i>, going through the first four or five chapters (along with the exercises).  I <i>love</i> calculus!  Derivatives have come back from the misty hollow of my memory with lightning speed, and the other bits (the chain rule, etc.) are hot on their heels.  It&#8217;s tremendously fun.  As for algebra, I&#8217;d completely forgotten about the binomial theorem (namely, (a+b)<sup>2</sup> = a<sup>2</sup> + 2ab + b<sup>2</sup>), and a lot of the exponential rules were a bit rusty (square root of x is the same as x<sup>1/2</sup>).  It&#8217;s nice to remember what I once knew.  And before long I&#8217;ll have enough of it under my belt that I&#8217;ll be able to go on and learn all the cool stuff I never got to.  Mmm. :)</p>

<p>And all this means I finally get to use my trusty old TI-86 again&#8230;</p>

<p>[tags]calculus[/tags]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/08/binomials-and-cubic-splines-and-such/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proofs and stuff</title>
		<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/08/proofs-and-stuff/</link>
		<comments>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/08/proofs-and-stuff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 02:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outside the Box]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsidethebox.blankslate.net/2006/08/12/proofs-and-stuff/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read Stevey&#8217;s Math Every Day post, and darn it all, I need to start brushing up on my math!  It&#8217;s been ages since I studied it (five years, to be precise), and while a fair amount is still with me (like addition and subtraction ;)), it&#8217;d be nice to re-master everything I once [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read Stevey&#8217;s <a href="http://www.cabochon.com/~stevey/blog-rants/blog-math-every-day.html">Math Every Day</a> post, and darn it all, I need to start brushing up on my math!  It&#8217;s been ages since I studied it (five years, to be precise), and while a fair amount is still with me (like addition and subtraction ;)), it&#8217;d be nice to re-master everything I once knew.  And then I&#8217;ll be able to start learning all the really cool stuff in math.  Mmm.</p>

<p>Problem is, I&#8217;m not quite sure how to go about doing it.  Pick up a textbook and work through the problems, one by one?  Find some other kind of math book?  Wikipedia?  MathWorld?  I don&#8217;t know.  I&#8217;m not even exactly sure what order I should study things in.  I do know that calculus was last, though. :)</p>

<p>I think I&#8217;m going to do what Stevey did &#8212; &#8220;math every day.&#8221;  Ten minutes a day will be good for starters, and on days when I have the time, I&#8217;ll be able to do more.  Mmm, I miss math.</p>

<p>[tags]math[/tags]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/08/proofs-and-stuff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Greek to me</title>
		<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/03/its-greek-to-me/</link>
		<comments>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/03/its-greek-to-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 04:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Math]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalbridge.blankslate.net/2006/03/01/its-greek-to-me/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night I spent the evening reading Paul Graham essays (and thus wanting to learn Lisp :)).  Also read Eric Raymond&#8217;s How to Become a Hacker.  Interestingly enough, the brief discussions of math therein were like drops of water to a parched tongue, making me salivate for more.  The last math I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night I spent the evening reading <a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/">Paul Graham</a> essays (and thus wanting to learn Lisp :)).  Also read Eric Raymond&#8217;s <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/hacker-howto.html">How to Become a Hacker</a>.  Interestingly enough, the brief discussions of math therein were like drops of water to a parched tongue, making me salivate for more.  The last math I really did was AP Calculus back five years ago in high school, and all I can remember of <i>that</i> is the word &#8220;integral,&#8221; the word &#8220;derivative,&#8221; and something about <i>dy</i> over <i>dx</i> (I think).  So I pulled out my copy of Euclid&#8217;s <i>The Elements</i> (the three-volume Dover set) and started reading through the propositions.  (Disclaimer: despite the following sentence, I still think I&#8217;m a normal, healthy human being.)  It was <i>fun</i>. :)  Today I stopped in at the library after lunch and picked up a neat book called <i>The Nature and Power of Mathematics</i>.  I&#8217;ve only read 13 pages of it so far, but the two forces at work are readily apparent: the first is a strong desire to re-learn what I&#8217;ve forgotten and then to push the boundaries of my knowledge and burst out into new, glorious horizons of mathematical beauty; the second is a befuddled cloud that sits on my head and reminds me just how little I know about math nowadays, and that&#8217;s why half of what I read is hard to understand.  But obstacles are meant to be overcome, so I&#8217;ll press on until I can comprehend multivariable calculus and all that.  To infinity (wait, don&#8217;t limits have something to do with infinity?  It&#8217;s starting to come back&#8230;) and beyond! :)</p>

<p>[tags]math, Paul Graham, Euclid[/tags]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/03/its-greek-to-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
