I took that River’s Tale poem I wrote back in May, got rid of the gimmicky animations, and expanded the story so it’s a little more interesting. (I’ve left the old version up as well, for history’s sake.)
Last night I tried to find a decently formatted free EPUB of War and Peace. Nada. Most were painful, and not a single one had curly quotes. None of them.
So now of course I’m thinking about getting back into making free ebook editions of classic books. The hitch, though, is that in-depth proofing (checking the existing text — whether from Project Gutenberg or Wikisource or Google Books or elsewhere — for typos) takes a long time. It’s important, obviously, but it slows things down quite a bit.
Thus this poll. It’s for people who read ebooks. (Yes, I’ve done polls similar to this one in the past, but it’s been a while.)
Note: I plan to post the source of the ebooks I make (both future and existing ebooks) on GitHub, to make it easier for people to submit corrections and fork books and such.
Of the following, which would you prefer?
- Lots of ebooks, nicely formatted, with occasional typos
- Much fewer ebooks, nicely formatted, without any typos
Second question: Which of the following kinds of ebooks would you be interested in?
- Classics in English (Dickens, Austen, Tolstoy, etc.)
- Classics in their original languages (War and Peace in Russian, Three Musketeers in French, etc.)
- Classic sf&f (Verne, Wells, Morris, MacDonald, Dunsany, etc.)
- Fairy tales and folk tales in English (Grimm, Lang, Andersen, etc.)
- Adventure tales (Haggard, Stevenson, etc.)
- Mystery/horror tales (Sherlock Holmes, Poe, etc.)
- English poetry
- Latin/Greek books
- English translations of Latin/Greek books
- History books
- Essays (Chesterton, etc.)
- Other (write-in)
Last question: EPUB or Kindle?
As I’ve begun blogging again, a voice in my head keeps demanding to know how I dare have the gall to consider my opinions important enough to post online for (an admittedly small sliver of) the world to see.
It’s a persuasive voice, and I see now how often it has silenced me, stifling my words because I am dumb or I have nothing worthwhile to say or I’ll just make a fool of myself or I’ll get in a heated argument and I’m not good at arguments. Its list of reasons is long.
While heated arguments still aren’t worth getting into, I’ve been thinking about what this voice tells me, and I’ve come to the retrospectively obvious realization that it is wrong. It is wrong not because I am important, but because other people are.
I write because someday, something I say may help someone else in some small way, and helping each other is one of the most important things we do here on Earth.
The voice is shouting at me right now that this is ridiculous and that I’m tremendously arrogant to think that my weak writing could possibly help anyone. Perhaps. But I’ve read many things that have changed me, and if others’ writing can do that for me, mine may yet do that for others.
I’m writing this about myself, but of course it’s just as true of everyone else, too.
I like Kris Sowersby’s suggestions for a more ideal OpenType user interface in document design apps like InDesign.
As promised, “Queen of the Cruel Sea” is finished and available for reading on the web and in EPUB, Kindle, and PDF. I hope y’all enjoy it. (FYI, the background cover art is Seastorm, a piece I painted a few years ago.)
I’m still waking up early every morning to write, which is the only reason this story is finished instead of having fallen by the wayside like so many other stories and novels I’ve begun. So that’s good — I’m finally getting the hang of this writing thing. Expect many more stories and poems and novels in the years to come.
And now that this is out the door (even though it’s not October 1 yet), my sabbatical has officially begun. Farewell till February!
Today I finished the first draft of “Queen of the Cruel Sea,” clocking in at just over 11,000 words. Not terribly long, but this happens to be the first time I’ve stuck with writing long enough to produce a full draft of a piece of fiction longer than a few pages. (I’m not counting Out of Time, my pathetic NaNoWriMo novel from 2007.)
My routine of waking up early to write each morning is working well, as is the outlining process. Getting the story finished by the end of the month shouldn’t be a problem at all.
I liked this bit from Orson Scott Card’s August 14 Uncle Orson Reviews Everything column (I’ve edited out some of his bold formatting, and thanks to Liz Busby for the link):
The upper division college English students I teach are almost uniform in their ignorance of how to think logically, avoid fallacy, support or refute an idea with evidence, or even develop coherent ideas in clear English sentences.
The exceptions are almost all students who were home-schooled, or who come from homes where the parents read books and discuss ideas and facts and history and news with their children.
What can you do about this, short of home-schooling your children?
Read books and discuss ideas and facts and history and news with your children.
You have no idea of how much power parents have, compared to mere teachers. You can raise open-minded, skeptical, well-educated children just by keeping your own educational process alive … and talking about it at home.
Project Gitenberg is a project to take Project Gutenberg texts and put them on GitHub for better version control and issue tracking. As they say on the site, this allows for cool things like using post-commit hooks to automatically generate EPUB and PDF files whenever a change is committed to the book repository. And pull requests are nice for submitting changes. (Nicer than an email with a changelist? I don’t know. But the coder part of me is excited about this.) Thanks to Tod Robbins for the heads up.
If/when I get back into making ebooks, I’ll most likely do something similar to this and put the source files up on GitHub.
Speaking of making ebooks: For about a year now I’ve been mulling around an idea for an md2epub replacement called Caxton that would make it easier to publish ebooks — particularly, inheritance of styles throughout a series, plugins, and a templating language. I’ll talk more about it when it’s closer to being done.
A good bit from chapter 20 of G. K. Chesterton’s Heretics:
Whether the human mind can advance or not, is a question too little discussed, for nothing can be more dangerous than to found our social philosophy on any theory which is debatable but has not been debated. But if we assume, for the sake of argument, that there has been in the past, or will be in the future, such a thing as a growth or improvement of the human mind itself, there still remains a very sharp objection to be raised against the modern version of that improvement. The vice of the modern notion of mental progress is that it is always something concerned with the breaking of bonds, the effacing of boundaries, the casting away of dogmas. But if there be such a thing as mental growth, it must mean the growth into more and more definite convictions, into more and more dogmas. The human brain is a machine for coming to conclusions; if it cannot come to conclusions it is rusty. When we hear of a man too clever to believe, we are hearing of something having almost the character of a contradiction in terms. It is like hearing of a nail that was too good to hold down a carpet; or a bolt that was too strong to keep a door shut. Man can hardly be defined, after the fashion of Carlyle, as an animal who makes tools; ants and beavers and many other animals make tools, in the sense that they make an apparatus. Man can be defined as an animal that makes dogmas. As he piles doctrine on doctrine and conclusion on conclusion in the formation of some tremendous scheme of philosophy and religion, he is, in the only legitimate sense of which the expression is capable, becoming more and more human. When he drops one doctrine after another in a refined scepticism, when he declines to tie himself to a system, when he says that he has outgrown definitions, when he says that he disbelieves in finality, when, in his own imagination, he sits as God, holding no form of creed but contemplating all, then he is by that very process sinking slowly backwards into the vagueness of the vagrant animals and the unconsciousness of the grass. Trees have no dogmas. Turnips are singularly broad-minded.
Lately I’ve started getting up early to write (long experience having shown that that’s the only way that works for me), which hopefully will result in some finished stories and eventually novels in the nearish future. I’m also now listing current projects at the top of my writing page, for what it’s worth.
My current project is tentatively called “Queen of the Cruel Sea.” It began life as a brief scene I wrote when I was playing around with Cathode a couple years ago. Since then I’ve tinkered with the story every few months, getting to 11,000 words written on it last year, but plot issues forced me to start over. Between that first brief scene and this current draft, only the title remains the same. The story is, however, much better, I think. I’ve written around 4,300 words so far, with three scenes down and five to go. (Assuming things don’t change too drastically with the outline as I get further along. I’ve already had to revise the outline in some substantial ways based on how the first three scenes went.)
This also marks my first time trying a variation on Rachel Aaron’s technique. First I write a high-level outline (beginning, end, and then middle to connect the two) and revise it a few times till I’m happy enough to move forward. I then go through each scene, writing a very detailed paragraph-by-paragraph outline including dialogue, and then I write the full scene.
So far, it’s working well. Figuring out the detailed outline before I write the actual words has been a huge help, making it far easier for me to see and fix issues (and so more quickly). It’s like figuring out an algorithm in pseudocode before actually writing the code. I recommend it.
Anyway, after I finish and release “Cruel Sea” (by the end of September, a deadline I just made up because I need something solid to work towards), I’m planning to start writing novels instead of shorter works, beginning with a science fiction standalone. And of course plans are subject to revision, same as my plots. And life, though not quite in the same way.