<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newsweek&#8217;s top 100 books of all time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bencrowder.net/blog/2009/07/newsweeks-top-100-books-of-all-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2009/07/newsweeks-top-100-books-of-all-time/</link>
	<description>I make stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:55:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2009/07/newsweeks-top-100-books-of-all-time/#comment-5367</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bencrowder.net/?p=3707#comment-5367</guid>
		<description>Fair enough. It&#039;s still coming... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough. It&#8217;s still coming&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristin Roney</title>
		<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2009/07/newsweeks-top-100-books-of-all-time/#comment-5339</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristin Roney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bencrowder.net/?p=3707#comment-5339</guid>
		<description>Oh c&#039;mon, don&#039;t cop out on us completely. At least make tiers (best ten, next ten, etc.). But I guess I&#039;ll take what I can get. Can&#039;t wait for it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh c&#8217;mon, don&#8217;t cop out on us completely. At least make tiers (best ten, next ten, etc.). But I guess I&#8217;ll take what I can get. Can&#8217;t wait for it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2009/07/newsweeks-top-100-books-of-all-time/#comment-5338</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bencrowder.net/?p=3707#comment-5338</guid>
		<description>When I come up with my list, I&#039;m thinking I won&#039;t actually number it; instead of being &quot;Ben&#039;s top however many books, in order,&quot; it&#039;ll just be &quot;Ben&#039;s favorite books,&quot; ordered by genre and then probably alphabetically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I come up with my list, I&#8217;m thinking I won&#8217;t actually number it; instead of being &#8220;Ben&#8217;s top however many books, in order,&#8221; it&#8217;ll just be &#8220;Ben&#8217;s favorite books,&#8221; ordered by genre and then probably alphabetically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liza</title>
		<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2009/07/newsweeks-top-100-books-of-all-time/#comment-5337</link>
		<dc:creator>Liza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bencrowder.net/?p=3707#comment-5337</guid>
		<description>This list is completely lame.  Why is Hamlet before King Lear? Why is War and Peace before Anna Karenina? Why are A passage to India and Lolita before Death Comes for the Archbishop? Most importantly, where is Villete?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This list is completely lame.  Why is Hamlet before King Lear? Why is War and Peace before Anna Karenina? Why are A passage to India and Lolita before Death Comes for the Archbishop? Most importantly, where is Villete?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2009/07/newsweeks-top-100-books-of-all-time/#comment-5334</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bencrowder.net/?p=3707#comment-5334</guid>
		<description>Not to mention that &lt;i&gt;Jane Eyre&lt;/i&gt; is also absent. Tsk, tsk, Newsweek. I&#039;m working on my own list and yes, I&#039;ll post it. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention that <i>Jane Eyre</i> is also absent. Tsk, tsk, Newsweek. I&#8217;m working on my own list and yes, I&#8217;ll post it. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristin Roney</title>
		<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2009/07/newsweeks-top-100-books-of-all-time/#comment-5328</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristin Roney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 08:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bencrowder.net/?p=3707#comment-5328</guid>
		<description>Agreed. There is something off about this list. It could be that there are four Shakespeare works in a row right in the middle of the list. Or that Lolita is so much higher than Lord of the Flies. Or that Walden is absent altogether. Grrr!

I think the only purpose of lists like this is to get people riled up and thinking about their own lists. There must be some (marketing?) value to be found in eliciting a hundred thousand simultaneous cries of &quot;How dare they?!?&quot; from their readers. 

I hope you will seriously consider posting your own list--at least a top 20--because you are probably the most well-read person I know. I&#039;m curious to see if your list really would be dominated by Project Gutenberg books, as I suspect it would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. There is something off about this list. It could be that there are four Shakespeare works in a row right in the middle of the list. Or that Lolita is so much higher than Lord of the Flies. Or that Walden is absent altogether. Grrr!</p>
<p>I think the only purpose of lists like this is to get people riled up and thinking about their own lists. There must be some (marketing?) value to be found in eliciting a hundred thousand simultaneous cries of &#8220;How dare they?!?&#8221; from their readers. </p>
<p>I hope you will seriously consider posting your own list&#8211;at least a top 20&#8211;because you are probably the most well-read person I know. I&#8217;m curious to see if your list really would be dominated by Project Gutenberg books, as I suspect it would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
