<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interleavings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bencrowder.net/blog/2008/12/interleavings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2008/12/interleavings/</link>
	<description>I make stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:45:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2008/12/interleavings/#comment-4507</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bencrowder.net/?p=2882#comment-4507</guid>
		<description>Scott: I&#039;m not sure if it&#039;s actually the technical term for it, but what the heck -- if it&#039;s not, it should be. :P

Zillah: What can I say? :)

Alyssa: It turns a volleying of monologues back and forth into what becomes a dialogue, almost like reading a play.  And I agree, it does take a little less mental energy that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott: I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s actually the technical term for it, but what the heck &#8212; if it&#8217;s not, it should be. :P</p>
<p>Zillah: What can I say? :)</p>
<p>Alyssa: It turns a volleying of monologues back and forth into what becomes a dialogue, almost like reading a play.  And I agree, it does take a little less mental energy that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alyssa</title>
		<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2008/12/interleavings/#comment-4496</link>
		<dc:creator>Alyssa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bencrowder.net/?p=2882#comment-4496</guid>
		<description>Just a quick opinion: I think the interleaving allows for *less* mental energy, actually, at least in *writing* the reply. It allows for the replier to not think about how to write paragraphs in a way that the reader will remember the original question or topic. Instead, the question is immediately followed by the answer.

Easy peasy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick opinion: I think the interleaving allows for *less* mental energy, actually, at least in *writing* the reply. It allows for the replier to not think about how to write paragraphs in a way that the reader will remember the original question or topic. Instead, the question is immediately followed by the answer.</p>
<p>Easy peasy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zillah</title>
		<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2008/12/interleavings/#comment-4495</link>
		<dc:creator>Zillah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bencrowder.net/?p=2882#comment-4495</guid>
		<description>You and Sean...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You and Sean&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott L. Peterson</title>
		<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2008/12/interleavings/#comment-4494</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott L. Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bencrowder.net/?p=2882#comment-4494</guid>
		<description>I, too, switched from &quot;e-mail&quot; to &quot;email&quot; within the past, oh, few years, since it&#039;s evidently considered more &quot;standard&quot; - though I like the hyphenated version better.

The interleaving also has its place. It seems more practical, but since it takes more (mental) energy, and our culture tends to prefer what it views as brevity over practicality (at least in casual contexts), interleaving is a no-go. (Thanks for the term, by the way - I hadn&#039;t hear it before.)

Judging from my comments, I probably qualify for &quot;language geek&quot; status to most folks. I don&#039;t mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, switched from &#8220;e-mail&#8221; to &#8220;email&#8221; within the past, oh, few years, since it&#8217;s evidently considered more &#8220;standard&#8221; &#8211; though I like the hyphenated version better.</p>
<p>The interleaving also has its place. It seems more practical, but since it takes more (mental) energy, and our culture tends to prefer what it views as brevity over practicality (at least in casual contexts), interleaving is a no-go. (Thanks for the term, by the way &#8211; I hadn&#8217;t hear it before.)</p>
<p>Judging from my comments, I probably qualify for &#8220;language geek&#8221; status to most folks. I don&#8217;t mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
