Tweety bird

After resisting for a long time, I’ve given in: I’m now on Twitter. :) (Username bencrowder.)

Why’d I join? For a while I felt like Twitter was just Facebook status lines on steroids — an endless need to put something in that status area and change it regularly. I don’t want more of that. I really don’t.

But then I read Rands’ We Travel in Tribes article (warning, there’s some strong language), and I realized that Twitter is more than just a status line. First, it’s blogging in miniature. And I like blogging. (As if you couldn’t tell. :P) This way I can send write shorter bits more often, which’ll be nice when I don’t have time to write a full post. And the writer in me is intrigued at the 140-character constraint — that’s a perfect inspiration for creativity right there, folks.

Second, Twitter is a way to get answers to questions:

Where I used to use Google, I now use Twitter for questions, because not only do I get the answer, I also get the opinion. And sometimes I get my world rocked with random, psychic, off-the-cuff, tangential information that Google will never give me because Google doesn’t know who I am.

There’ve been times where I’ve thought about using Facebook statuses to get answers, but it hasn’t felt like a really good vehicle for that, primarily because you can’t reply specifically to a status line — you can only write on someone’s wall, but if they change their status later, then it’s almost impossible to go back and find what you were replying to.

Third, I love people, and as Rands says in his yard sale post, “Twitter is all the social with very little network.” That’s the part that has me most excited, honestly. I could talk with people all day long. (Not that I would, of course — there’s a limit beyond which your productivity goes down a lot. But that’s neither here nor there. :))

I do have to say that I get the feeling that there aren’t that many people on Twitter — from my own Gmail contact list, for example, there’ve been several hundred on Facebook, and only 32 on Twitter. But I suppose it’s about quality and not quantity. ;)

Anyway, we’ll see how it pans out over the next few weeks; after I’ve tweeted around for a while, maybe I’ll be singing a different tune. Or maybe, like Michael Arrington, I’ll be saying that “I now need Twitter more than Twitter needs me.” (Check out BusinessWeek’s article on why Twitter matters.)

[tags]Twitter, Facebook[/tags]

Comments

Ben
May 19, 2008
7:53 am

One other thing: I realized this morning that in one way Twitter is a rather nice personal history tool. I don’t know if journal-writing is on the decline — maybe it is, maybe it isn’t — but I think it’s a very good thing that people are blogging and (in increasing numbers) tweeting, because at least they’re leaving some record behind of their existence. So Twitter is a way of doing family history. Fancy that. :P

Throw in your two cents