<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seven plays in seven days</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bencrowder.net/blog/2008/03/seven-plays-in-seven-days/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2008/03/seven-plays-in-seven-days/</link>
	<description>I make stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:45:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2008/03/seven-plays-in-seven-days/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blankslate.net/blog/2008/03/21/seven-plays-in-seven-days/#comment-383</guid>
		<description>Well, I don&#039;t know if I &lt;i&gt;quite&lt;/i&gt; agree with Johnson :P, but you really do have to be willing to strike out any passage that stops contributing to the work as a whole.  In revising my plays I&#039;ve had to cut out favorite sections all the time.  At first it was hard, but I&#039;ve gotten used to it -- besides, I can always use those sections again later in some other work.  And it actually feels rather cathartic to cut out all the fat and get straight to the meat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t know if I <i>quite</i> agree with Johnson :P, but you really do have to be willing to strike out any passage that stops contributing to the work as a whole.  In revising my plays I&#8217;ve had to cut out favorite sections all the time.  At first it was hard, but I&#8217;ve gotten used to it &#8212; besides, I can always use those sections again later in some other work.  And it actually feels rather cathartic to cut out all the fat and get straight to the meat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rikker</title>
		<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2008/03/seven-plays-in-seven-days/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>rikker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 17:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blankslate.net/blog/2008/03/21/seven-plays-in-seven-days/#comment-384</guid>
		<description>On how to revise &lt;i&gt;Out of Time&lt;/i&gt;, the wise words of Samuel Johnson come to mind:

&quot;Read over your compositions, and where ever you meet with a passage which you think is particularly fine, strike it out.&quot;

It&#039;s true. Or maybe it&#039;s just that Johnson, as a pioneering lexicographer, holds particular sway with me. I particularly love that in his 1755 dictionary, he defined lexicographer as &quot;a writer of dictionaries; a harmless drudge that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the signification of words.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On how to revise <i>Out of Time</i>, the wise words of Samuel Johnson come to mind:</p>
<p>&#8220;Read over your compositions, and where ever you meet with a passage which you think is particularly fine, strike it out.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true. Or maybe it&#8217;s just that Johnson, as a pioneering lexicographer, holds particular sway with me. I particularly love that in his 1755 dictionary, he defined lexicographer as &#8220;a writer of dictionaries; a harmless drudge that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the signification of words.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
