<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;ll have the carved duck, please</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/07/ill-have-the-carved-duck-please/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/07/ill-have-the-carved-duck-please/</link>
	<description>I make stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:51:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/07/ill-have-the-carved-duck-please/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topofthemountains.net/2006/07/09/ill-have-the-carved-duck-please/#comment-846</guid>
		<description>Andy: After reading G.K. Chesterton, I&#039;ve come to appreciate absurdity, but I do think it has to be handled correctly.  A lot of modern stuff (stuff being literature/movies/TV shows) aims for absurdity but fails miserably and ends up being just plain stupid.  At least in my experience. :)

I really like the idea of giving oneself a restrictive set of parameters, because constraints kindle creativity.  One of my writer friends challenged me to write a dialogue between two flowers, and a short story about betrayal in outer space, and having those constraints really unleashed my creativity.  One of these days I&#039;ll revise them and post them.

As for whether I&#039;m like this in person, I guess that depends on what you mean. :)  The &quot;filet mignon&quot; part?  Waxing poetic?  I think I &lt;i&gt;am&lt;/i&gt; like that in person, though my waxings poetic often come out better on paper (and yet every once in a while I utter a gem :)).

Speaking of which, I think this blog is a pretty accurate indicator of my personality.  I don&#039;t put up a facade to hide behind -- this is me, plain and simple.  (Or plain and tall, except I&#039;m not &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; tall.)  So yes, the Ben whose personality comes through in this blog is the same Ben in real life.  Those of you who know me can correct me if I&#039;m wrong. :)

Anna: My interest is piqued, and my acquiescence is granted. :)  Both copies here at the library are checked out, but when they get returned, I&#039;ll definitely look into it.

Sixline: Lol, a &quot;dude with a pen and paper&quot; works just as well as a &quot;writer.&quot;  The important thing is the writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy: After reading G.K. Chesterton, I&#8217;ve come to appreciate absurdity, but I do think it has to be handled correctly.  A lot of modern stuff (stuff being literature/movies/TV shows) aims for absurdity but fails miserably and ends up being just plain stupid.  At least in my experience. :)</p>
<p>I really like the idea of giving oneself a restrictive set of parameters, because constraints kindle creativity.  One of my writer friends challenged me to write a dialogue between two flowers, and a short story about betrayal in outer space, and having those constraints really unleashed my creativity.  One of these days I&#8217;ll revise them and post them.</p>
<p>As for whether I&#8217;m like this in person, I guess that depends on what you mean. :)  The &#8220;filet mignon&#8221; part?  Waxing poetic?  I think I <i>am</i> like that in person, though my waxings poetic often come out better on paper (and yet every once in a while I utter a gem :)).</p>
<p>Speaking of which, I think this blog is a pretty accurate indicator of my personality.  I don&#8217;t put up a facade to hide behind &#8212; this is me, plain and simple.  (Or plain and tall, except I&#8217;m not <i>that</i> tall.)  So yes, the Ben whose personality comes through in this blog is the same Ben in real life.  Those of you who know me can correct me if I&#8217;m wrong. :)</p>
<p>Anna: My interest is piqued, and my acquiescence is granted. :)  Both copies here at the library are checked out, but when they get returned, I&#8217;ll definitely look into it.</p>
<p>Sixline: Lol, a &#8220;dude with a pen and paper&#8221; works just as well as a &#8220;writer.&#8221;  The important thing is the writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sixline</title>
		<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/07/ill-have-the-carved-duck-please/#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>sixline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 20:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topofthemountains.net/2006/07/09/ill-have-the-carved-duck-please/#comment-845</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;and it was even good enough that I wasnâ€™t embarrassed after I finished writing.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Happens to me all the time.  But I&#039;m just a dude with a pen and paper-- I wouldn&#039;t call myself a writer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>and it was even good enough that I wasnâ€™t embarrassed after I finished writing.</p></blockquote>
<p>Happens to me all the time.  But I&#8217;m just a dude with a pen and paper&#8211; I wouldn&#8217;t call myself a writer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/07/ill-have-the-carved-duck-please/#comment-844</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topofthemountains.net/2006/07/09/ill-have-the-carved-duck-please/#comment-844</guid>
		<description>May I suggest a most excellent collection of essays for you to read, most on the subject of writing and reading?  I will assume your acquiescence, and give you the title: Mystery and Manners, by Flannery O&#039;Connor (who wrote the best short stories I have ever read).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I suggest a most excellent collection of essays for you to read, most on the subject of writing and reading?  I will assume your acquiescence, and give you the title: Mystery and Manners, by Flannery O&#8217;Connor (who wrote the best short stories I have ever read).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/07/ill-have-the-carved-duck-please/#comment-843</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topofthemountains.net/2006/07/09/ill-have-the-carved-duck-please/#comment-843</guid>
		<description>Hi again.

Course #1: I&#039;m the same way when it comes to writing ... well, *anything* creative.  I start things and then don&#039;t know how to continue them.  But I often think it would be a good creative exercise to give oneself a difficult or nonsensical situation and then figure out a way to make it make sense.  Or to give oneself any restrictive set of parameters and create something meaningful within them.  I also like weirdness and absurdity for their own sake, so I would come up with a story like yours on purpose. :)

Course #3: Are you like this in person? :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi again.</p>
<p>Course #1: I&#8217;m the same way when it comes to writing &#8230; well, *anything* creative.  I start things and then don&#8217;t know how to continue them.  But I often think it would be a good creative exercise to give oneself a difficult or nonsensical situation and then figure out a way to make it make sense.  Or to give oneself any restrictive set of parameters and create something meaningful within them.  I also like weirdness and absurdity for their own sake, so I would come up with a story like yours on purpose. :)</p>
<p>Course #3: Are you like this in person? :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
