Comments on: Storage and Javascript http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/06/storage-and-javascript/ The personal website of Ben Crowder Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:09:37 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Jonathan Aquino http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/06/storage-and-javascript/#comment-122 Jonathan Aquino Sun, 11 Jun 2006 07:44:54 +0000 http://outsidethebox.blankslate.net/2006/06/07/storage-and-javascript/#comment-122 Hi Ben - I loved Prototype, but am currently working with Dojo and would miss a lot of things from it (for largish Javascript projects). Three things: (1) the "require" statement for including neighbouring Javascript files, facilitating the organization of a Javascript project into one-class-per-file (2) the Widget superclass, for modularizing GUI elements into reusable panels/widgets (widget = html + javascript) (3) the dojo.io.connect() function that lets me hook into any function call -- before it, after it, around it. That said, it's probably overkill for more traditional websites. So I think I'll probably go Prototype for traditional sites, Dojo for richer, more javascript-heavy sites. Hi Ben – I loved Prototype, but am currently working with Dojo and would miss a lot of things from it (for largish Javascript projects). Three things:

(1) the “require” statement for including neighbouring Javascript files, facilitating the organization of a Javascript project into one-class-per-file

(2) the Widget superclass, for modularizing GUI elements into reusable panels/widgets (widget = html + javascript)

(3) the dojo.io.connect() function that lets me hook into any function call — before it, after it, around it.

That said, it’s probably overkill for more traditional websites. So I think I’ll probably go Prototype for traditional sites, Dojo for richer, more javascript-heavy sites.

]]>